Tag Archives: britain

The EU and the Big Hate

Yeah, the EU and Britain. This small island, which thinks it is off the coast of North America is vehemently anti-European, and will do almost everything in its power to leave the grand idea of Europe. The Conservatives, two thirds of the current ruling coalition love to fight themselves into a tizzy about the EU idea. While the other political parties are smart enough to keep shtum about their differences over Europe (and other bits of infighting), the Conservatives have not learned from the 1990’s that while the EU is unpopular in the UK, it really does not matter with regards to my daily life.

So this week, Cameron, yet again, went to an EU summit looking like a spoilt child swinging his mummy’s handbag all over the shop. Embarrassing, even though I really agree with what the PM actually had to say. But he does come across really badly whenever it comes to the EU. And the French, who are really just snivelling self serving imbeciles always come across as slick. Damn those cunning French!

Believe it or not, after all that, I am fairly Pro-European. ‘Fairly’ is the good term to use. To be honest, it does not makes a difference to me whether Brussels, London or Washington is making laws, my taxes are not dropping anytime soon. As a floating voter (and we are dangerous bastards) it is the money in my pocket, not the hue of a flag that swings my vote, if I bother to vote at all. And while I have an opinion on Europe, it will not make my mind up when I go to the polls in 2015. In 2010, I am glad we got a coalition, and despite the cock and bull in the press, I think most of the people who voted then believe it was the right choice for that election. Going into a recession meant that no political party came out with any good ideas to get the UK moving. And it is still the case two years later…

Back to the EU. So, I like it? Yes, but…that is it, the ‘but’ bit. I do appreciate and take advantage of the free trade, travel and movement of people part of the EU. In fact, it is one of the best ideals implemented in modern politics over the past two generations. A lot of Brits (except retirees to Spain) really have not taken advantage of this. Lazy language skills can be blamed for this. But I have. In terms of my personal life, cultural activities and business projects, I take advantage of the EU’s free movement of goods, services and people like crazy. You may have noticed all those visits to Poland over the past couple of years, tak?

That part of me would not have been possible if the EU did not exist. It opened my life in so many ways, probably not envisioned by the grandees who thought up the project in the first place. For that, I am eternally grateful, and if Britain was to withdraw from Europe, it would peeve me off. While my personal life would remain intact (although become more tricky), my working side would become an absolute nightmare, well, I will be blunt, impossible.

And I love my films, get it! (Don’t ask about the rewrite…)

But yes, there are things I do not like about the EU. It is undemocratic, there are a lot of institutions and conventions that the UK never voted to join but were shoehorned into and the corruption levels make duck houses seem like…well, mere duck houses…

The EU will probably never face a proper reformation of its financial order as long as the nations resort to petty squabbling. It is sad, because the big EU contributors are probably more aligned then it seems when it comes to reigning in corruption and budgets. But David Cameron’s wibbly wobbly attitude does not help . The last shameful embarrassment in the EU last year looked like a small man playing to some Middle Englanders rather than a Prime Minister actually leading.

From my own opinion I think it is good for Britain to be a net contributor to the EU. The fact that we have peaceful borders and benign neighbours who are unlikely to attack Britain in the near future is something that cannot be measured by the financial contribution we make (in addition to the extremely successful NATO). So, I would rather see a stable Greece sorting out its tax collection system rather than see a Greece mired in strikes and uncertainty.

In the end, Britain is not going to leave the EU anytime soon. And good. But I do worry about the long term political relationship that the UK is building for itself. I do not want to leave the EU, I want to see a strong, democratic institution that does allow for good business and trade and that keeps the peace on the continent. Both from a personal and professional point of view, I have taken advantage of Europe, and it is something that personally benefits me. I believe if more people in the UK had the attachment via people to the continent that I have, the tide of euroscepticism would be a lot less.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under britain, europe, news, political

The Olympics Cycle Past!

I must admit to being a bit quiet on the Olympic front. The world’s biggest party may well be happening in my city, but I have not been invited to it, so I really do not care.

However, even the cynic in me was persuaded to hop and roll to the bottom of my road to catch the Olympic Cycle riders fly past. With countries as diverse as Kazakstan, Iran and Australia, as well as the home grown Great Britain flying past my local area.

Thank you to the Olympians for providing a nice bit of entertainment, for free, at the bottom of my road and of course congratulations to Team GB for securing Gold and Bronze in the Men’s Time Trial. Special Kudos has to go to Bradley Wiggins – absolutely amazing man who has had one hell of a golden year.

2 Comments

Filed under britain, Sports

Film News – Beginning June 2012

A treat for you – here is a teaser clip from ‘Great Brytania’:

We shot this piece of footage at the beginning of May. It shows one of our Central characters, Magda, leaving the familial home in Poland to begin her long journey to London. For me, as a writer and director, there is a lot of heart in this scene. While technically fairly easy to shoot, the soundtrack was awful as there was a loud set of speakers above the flats blaring out rock music, plus a hell of a lot of people shouting on their mobile phones (unusual as the Polish are fairly reserved on the mobile devices). I really had to thank the crew for being so patient! From a mood setting point of view, this is a beautiful scene. Just one person and her interaction with the audience. Always difficult to pull off, but it was done magnificently by Marzena Więcek, who plays the character of Magda.

A fortnight ago, I told you about meetings and they have gone well. It looks like we have some real in-kind support which will hopefully help us with the making of the film, particularly in knocking out a decent story. As the details become confirmed, I will reveal more about who I am working with and when the film is finished we will furnish you with the names of these organisations.

And stick around…I am currently editing a proper teaser and hope to have one ready by the end of the month! That is going to be fun – I love a good teaser, and doing one really gets you in the mood for editing the film proper. The interesting thing about this film is going to be the way it will be shot. Before, I have always shot in one blast, but this one is different. I am planning to shoot over the course of two years, and edit as I go along. So, like a jog-saw puzzle, this film will be slotted together.

It means that I have not even began the casting process for the UK credits, but I have been busy organising locations and as you can already see, meetings with various organisations in order to facilitate production. It is weird to still be doing my pre-production when filming has already started. I have to change my hats from one to the next! But such are the financial constraints that I am juggling all the time. This is the challenge…

I do feel good about Great Brytania however. Although this is one ambitious film (who am I kidding, this is a headf**k!), there has been so much help surrounding the production, that I feel incredibly lucky to be abl to head this project. I certainly would not have got this far were it not for the incredible support that I have received and I am still receiving. There is an incredible amount of goodwill behind this project, more than I have received on any of my other films shot previously. Here it goes, the editing truly begins. Wow, can you imagine, Pre-Production, Production and Post-Production happening simultaneously – can you see why this is ambitious…

1 Comment

Filed under britain, film, london, poland

The last Jubilee – can and should Great Britain become a republic?

Tomorrow the UK and 15 other Comonwealth Realms will celebrate the Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II. Only one other monarch in Commonwealth history has reached the 60 year mark of rule, and that was Queen Victoria who was on the throne for 63 years. It is very probable, that Elizabeth II will surpass this total, and if I was a betting man, there is a good chance that in ten years time, there could be a celebration of a Platinum Jubilee. Unlike the Golden Jubilee in 2002 which kind of got melded into the Millenuim Celebrations, the Diamond Jubilee has stood out on its own, and will probably be more appreciated than the upcoming Olympic Games in London. It helps that two bank holidays have been strapped nto this weekend – everybody loves time off. Or in my case, extra money for working on those days…

But once the dust settles, and life gets back to normal, here is a question to answer. Can and should Great Britain become a republic. Yes, should the United Kingdom loose the ‘Kingdom’ in ts title and become the United Republic by ditching the Queen as its head of state? Well, here is my own, very personal opinion on the subject.

In effect, the UK is a republic, and more importantly, it is democratic. While all the titles of various public bodies have the term ‘Royal’, ‘Crown’ or something else that implies a connection to Her Majesty, the Queen wields no power. While laws would have to be changed, so that everything operates legally, it would in effect just be a rebranding exercise. Flipping to a republic would just mean dotting a few i’s and crossing a few t’s. That is that. And it has happened before at the end of the Civil War

But should the UK become a republic? While there are some die hard republicans in the UK who believe that the Queen should be tried for Treason, theft and all matter of other grandiose crimes, the bulk of the population – at the moment running at 80% – is in favour of retaining the monarchy. It will be interesting to see what this figure will be once a new monarch ascends the throne after Elizabeth II, but for now Britain is going to remain as a Kingdom and will probably do so as long as the country exists on a map.

So, what is my opinion? Well, I am unashamedly Republican in theory (I believe that all hereditary positions are parasitical), but in practice I am a Monarchist. How do I hold these dual views? Well, it is quite simple; I live in the UK, and I pay my taxes, so I will hold those views, as it is my right to do so. What does that mean in reality?

If I was setting up a new country tomorrow, it would be a republic. Like the bulk of new countries that have established themsevles during the past seventy years, only a few of them have chosen a hereditary Head of State. However, if there was a vote tomorrow, or during any part of my lifetime about whether Britain should become a republic, I would always vote in favour to keep the monarchy.

Why?

Well, it works. As strange as it sounds, as so out of place as the concept of monarchy is in the 21st Century, I would still vote to keep Elizabeth II or any of her descendents above me in the official pecking order. Do not ask me why, but I would not want a President Blair or Cameron smiling at me as I entered the arrivals hall of Heathrow Airport, nor would I want to lick anyone else’s head as I send my letters to their far flung destinations. For now, I am happy as I am, living in a kingdon, a United Kingdom. The UK is an odd country in many respects. Laws are not applied evenly across the country (Scots Law vs the Laws of England and Wales), there are varying levels of democracy across the land(devolution) and the changes from one part of Britain to the next (check out London compared to the rest of the UK) are vast for such a small island.

Britain is a strange country, and the monarchy adds into the blend of weirdness abut the UK. The monarchy is one of those things that makes Britain, British. Simmilarly to keeping the Imperial system of measures and weights for some parts of our daily lives like drinks but not others like petrol, keeping a monarchy makes Britain unique amongst the blandness of the world. Yes, we are a democracy, but on our own terms.

To be blunt, the system works very well. If it ain’t broke, why fix it?

So in light of all f this, while I will not be celebrating the Jubilee, I am very happy to be earning some extra cash for the fact that will be working through it. And whether you are waving a flag, making yourself a lovely cup of tea or simply taking time off, enjoy the Diamond Jubilee tomorrow. Because such an event will probably not happen for a long time to come…

2 Comments

Filed under britain, london, news, political

Recession? What recession?

Last month, for some bizarre reason, people up and down the length and breath of Britain happily spent their days queuing up for petrol.

What a bunch of sad idiots we all are.

Of course, the government encouraged panic buying, and shockingly, for once, people actually listened to them.

Now this week, we have the news that Britain may have avoided slipping back into a recession due to this panic buying, forcing people across the country to actually spend.

And who said that politicians are not smart…

1 Comment

Filed under britain, money, political

Film Poster

Just to get me started, I have a new poster for the film. Well, actually, this poster has been in circulation amongst the production team for a while, but I think it is time to release it generally.

This will not be the final design for the poster. Hell, it is not even the final name – South of the River is very much a working title. Actually, at the production level, we are calling it Ritchie Fernando, after one of the characters, just because it is less of a mouthful. For applications to grants, permission letters to organisations and to the performers, we are calling it South of The River, because it sounds more artistic. And for the general public? Well, that is something we still have not finalised.

But one thing that is very much a part of this film, is the bilingual nature of it. South of The River is partly set in Poland and partly set in London, and also has two languages for the dialogue in the film, English and Polish. It is just the way the story rumbles, the way my imagination held itself in a thrall while writing the script, and the despair the production team has as we translate the script into two languages. Already, the Polish dialogues have been translated, but now it is to translate everything into Polish, so both sides of the linguistic divide can get an idea of what the hell is going on.

Unfortunately, I am not the translator. I have someone working very hard on this – and I feel the pain. Just inserting the translated bits into the script numbs my mind, but to translate, check, re-check fr mistakes takes precision and skill. I have no attention to detail, when it comes to the written word, so all my mistakes are there to air in public. A quick trawl through this blog reveals my awful spelling and grammar, so in a script, this is unforgiveable. For me, writing the script is quick, but proof reading and correcting the script takes ages.

But there is something exciting about making a film in two countries. Sure, the logistics are an absolute nightmare. And as a result, my brain really hurts with what to do and how to do it. But in the end, I have wanted to do this story for a very long time. A burning desire has been inside of me, and it is this desire that has led me to this bi-lingual production.

And yes, it is terrifying. Making a film is always scary, but to use two different languages, to shoot in two different countries and to shoot across two different cultures. This is going to be a huge challenge for me to accomplish.

So you can see why the blogging has been very patchy since the start of the year. It is why I have had to reduce my presence online. It is a simple reaction to actually getting things done. Sure, I still procrastinate, and forget things. But life, already busy, is about to get a whole lot busier. THose 10,000 hours are going to get achieved soon…

6 Comments

Filed under art, britain, film, poland

The UK…

…is a complex country. Growing up in the UK, the differences between Britain, Great Britain, England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are simple for me to figure out. However, for a lot of people out there, it is complex enough. For those Anglophiles in the blogging realm, here is a video (with the fastest narration I have ever heard):

And it is correct. Mostly. The whole Church of England thing is just that, the Church of England, while in Scotland, there is the Church of Scotland, not headed by the monarch, and no one touches Northern Ireland’s theocracy with a barge pole (thank goodness). Enjoy the vid!

Oh and those Dependent Territories are effectively ruled by themselves except for foreign and defence affairs which are taken over by the UK Parliament. Simple…

5 Comments

Filed under britain, political